Gay Marriage Showdowns
The California Supreme Court gave gay rights advocates a major victory in May by ruling that the state’s constitution guarantees same-sex couples the same marriage rights as opposite-sex pairs. Thousands of same-sex couples from California and other states – since California does not have a residency requirement – have already taken advantage of the decision to obtain legal recognition for their unions. Opponents, however, have placed on the state’s Nov. 4 ballot a constitutional amendment that would deny marriage rights to same-sex couples by defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Similar proposals are on the ballot in Arizona and Florida. The ballot-box showdowns come as nationwide polls indicate growing support for some legal protection for same-sex couples, but not necessarily marriage equality. In California, early polls showed support for the ballot measure, but more recently it has been trailing. Meanwhile, marriage-equality cases are pending before state high courts in Connecticut and Iowa, with decisions expected soon. Massachusetts became the first state to legally permit gay marriage, in 2004.
By Kenneth Jost
Affirmative action has sunk deep roots in American higher education, government and business. But tension still runs strong between the ideal of choosing school and job candidate purely on merit, and requirements to factor in other criteria – including race. This November, ballot initiatives in at least two states would eliminate race, but not socioeconomic, preference. And big states including California, Florida and Texas are still struggling to reconcile legal mandates restricting the use of race in college admissions with the goal of increasing diversity. One stumbling block: affirmative action didn’t lessen the stunning disparities that plague elementary and high school education, disparities that often follow the color line. Still, the open racial hostility that marked opposition to affirmative action decades ago has faded. Even some race preference critics don’t want to eliminate it entirely. Instead, they’re exploring ways to keep diversity without eroding admission and hiring standards.
By Peter Katel
Saving Fannie and Freddie
The federal government’s bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac came after years of warnings that the two mortgage giants – which hold or guarantee about 70 percent of all U.S. mortgages, worth some $5 trillion – were ripe for a fall. Critics cautioned that their quasi-government business model, under which they serve both a profit-seeking mission and a government-subsidized public goal of fostering affordable housing, was a recipe for trouble. Conservatives are calling for Fannie and Freddie to be cut loose from government backing once their immediate financial crisis is over. But the companies continue to enjoy support among key congressional Democrats. Some experts say the broad collapse on Wall Street in the days after Fannie and Freddie’s bailout will make it hard for policy makers to move toward privatizing the two firms anytime soon.
By Thomas J. Billitteri
Gay Marriage Showdowns
Posted by Marc Segers on 9/25/2008 11:22:00 AM