Health-Care Reform

Is universal coverage too expensive?

By Marcia Clemmitt, August 28, 2009

For the first time in 15 years, health-care reform has moved to the top of Washington's agenda. A new Democratic president and Democratic majorities in the House and Senate have declared two major goals: increase coverage to near-universal levels and stop the huge, annual cost increases that are gradually putting health care out of reach for small businesses and low-income families. Most proposals would subsidize insurance for low-income Americans and create new, government-regulated insurance markets for those without employer-provided coverage. One controversial scheme would create a publicly run insurance plan and require individuals to buy coverage. Congressional Republicans and some Democrats argue, however, that the plan would be too expensive and would allow government to meddle too much in health care. And at angry town hall meetings in August, some even charged, incorrectly, that the arrangement would establish “death panels” that would deny treatment to elderly and disabled patients.

The Issues:
* Could a single-payer health-care system work for America?
* Should reform include a publicly run health insurance plan?
* Would universal coverage be too expensive?

To view the entire report, login to CQ Researcher Online [subscription required], or purchase the CQ Researcher PDF